"We have a very different relationship to authority. In the 1960s, Craig Claiborne [the New York Times' first critic] could 'educate' his readers. But now we're a bit different. We're democratizing everything. If anyone can be president, why can't we all be critics?"Davis concludes that the "traditional reviews written with an adherence to journalistic ethics seem more trustworthy" and continue to be what restaurants strive for when being assessed. I must say, I agree. Take Ruth Reichl's Garlic & Sapphires, for example. While anyone can write a review of Daniel, Reichl is able to do so with a prose and reputable knowledge that is incomparable. Everyone can write a review, not everyone can make a piece of art. Thanks to all the restaurant critics out there! Oink oink!
Posted using ShareThis
No comments:
Post a Comment